Lord Bentinck, then Governor-General, took the first steps
in implementing the new policy. Ih the first place the commercial
possibilities of the area had to be explored. To this end a young
British officer, Alexander Burnes, made his way in 1832 to Kabul,
Bukhara, and back to India through Persia on a fact finding mission.
2 The next step taken
was the opening of the Indus river to navigation. The Emirs of
Sind were opposed to the idea until the British hinted that they
might allow Ranjit Singh to expand at Sind's expense. Sind promptly
agreed while Ranjit Singh himself was entirely agreeable to the
plan. 3
The events of the early 1830's convinced the authors of the
forward policy that they were correct in their analysis of the
situation. With the Persian threat to Herat in 1833, Bentinck
decided that a more active policy was necessary to protect the
Indian frontiers. The British were always afraid of the unsettling
effect the presence of a strong or unfriendly power on the frontiers
would have on the internal peace of India. Whoever held Herat
could directly influence Kandahar and Kabul, and the forward policy
made Kandahar and Kabul part of the Indian defense system. Since
Persia was presumed to be under Russian control after 1828, a
Persian Herat would bring Russian influence to the borders of
India with possibly dire consequences. The British therefore decided
to prop up Afghanistan in the hope that it would become strong
and united under a ruler friendly to Britain. Shah Shuja was available
and eager to cooperate. After the Persians withdrew from Herat
however, Shuja's failure did not seem so serious and nothing further
was done for the moment.
The forward policy, originally developed by the Tory government,
was adopted by the succeeding Whig government after 1830. The
Whig Foreign Secretary, Viscount Palmerston, originally had no
policy with respect to Western Asia, and he had allowed the forward
policy to be carried out from India on its own momentum. But after
the treaty of Unkiar-Skelesi in 1833, the need to counter Russian
influence became one of his main considerations. Palmerston went
a step further and began to work towards displacing Russian influence,
not just blocking it. 4
The years following 1833 saw a change in British public opinion which came to regard Russia as the chief threat to world peace. Russophobia was accompanied by an outpouring of anti-Russian propaganda which pointed out how Russia was tightening its hold on the east and how this threatened British interests, especially in India. Russophobia however, was only the surface manifestation of the worsening relations between England and Russia, reflecting the declining importance of Anglo-Russian trade, the contrast between liberal England and reactionary Russia, increasing knowledge of Russia which left unfavorable impressions, and the poor image of Nicholas I in Britain. Deeper was the vague and in-tangible, grand geopolitical conflict between Russia, expanding in the heart of Eurasia, and Britain, expanding around the periphery of Eurasia. 5