The British thought that Russia controlled Persia as well but
Persian policy towards Russia was governed by fear and the lack
of any alternative. Britain had abandoned Persia in 1828 but as
the forward policy developed, an effort was made to regain a foothold
there. There were various moves to upgrade the embassy to Persia
and in 1832, military advisors were sent from India to train the
Persian army. 3 When
Fath Ali Shah died in 1834, his grandson and heir apparent, Mohammed
Mirza, was at Tabriz. Two of the late ruler's sons also claimed
the throne, but Mohammed Mirza had the support of both Britain
and Russia. Russia's offer to send troops was declined but British
financial assistance was accepted and British officers led the
army that defeated the other claimants. 4
It might be expected that British influence in Persia was regaining
lost ground.
The Russian empire was also suffering from distracting revolts within its frontiers. In 1834 a new leader, Shimil, appeared at the head of the Murid revolt in the Caucasus. Shamil carried the fighting to the Russian controlled lowlands and intensified the struggle. Expeditions were sent into the mountains by the Russians, but although they could capture mountain strongholds, they couldn't hold them and they could never lay hands on Shamil. The increased fighting put a strain on Russian finances and prevented them from coping with other problems. 5 The same situation was incurred by revolts in 1836 and 1837 among the Kazakhs. Kanesary Kasim united most of the Great and Middle Hordes against the Russians and for several years thereafter, made life on the frontier insecure, interrupted Russian trade, and cut off Russian contacts with the Uzbeg Khanates. 6 These Russian setbacks however did not cause the British to abandon their policies.